Skip to main content

Who would have thought

At the end of chapter five we see Stephen finally detach himself from faith. He completely abandons any form of Christianity—his commitment to his secularism cannot even be broken by the pleas and heartbreak of his own mother. The state of Stephen's faith took a complete 180 from his strict letter-of-the-law observance of religion. He prayed routinely at Clongowes even through freezing cold and sickness, and he disciplined his senses, forgoing mortal comforts all in fear of being damned to hell. While it may seem surprising to see the pious young Stephen's transformation to complete secularism, given the nature of Stephen's relationship with his faith, we really should have seen that coming.

Stephen's faith has always been driven by fear. In the beginning at Clongowes, he was driven to pray by the belief that missing a single prayer will damn him to hell. It seems that Stephen's faith is not genuine and kind of misguided. The fire and brimstone speech is one of the epiphanies or growing moments that occur at the end of the chapters. This time Stephen has supposedly realized his sinful actions and desires to reform himself. However the speech drives Stephen to fix his sinful actions, not because he has a true desire to reform himself, but because he is scared of the consequences of not doing so. The same insincerity in his reformation can be seen in how he disciplines his senses. He avoids even looking at women, avoids warming himself at the fire, and lowkey tortures himself by not drying his neck before going outside and sleeping in uncomfortable positions. Again he does these things out of fear. Stephen tries to repress and ignore his sinful desires by denying himself physical comfort and avoiding the sight of women, rather than accepting that he has those sinful desires and simply resisting them.

It's clear Stephen's piety is not driven by true faith, so he has a weak relationship with his religion. It should not come as a surprise that when he matures, he begins to be skeptical about his religion which was forced onto him through fear. One question I still have though is: is faith based on faith still genuine faith? If Stephen believes for a fact that his sins will results in eternal damnation, is that real faith?

Comments

  1. You make a very interesting point. Throughout the novel Stephen takes things to the extreme in somewhat weird ways. Although Stephen views things in a religious context, the time when he physically tortured himself rather than develop mentally proves he doesn’t take religion to heart. Rather, religion plays a different role in Stephen’s life — it provides an outlet to illustrate his art and establish Stephen’s satanic hero persona.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with this sentiment. Stephen is very much driven by what he thinks he's supposed to do and be. He's been taught that he needs to pray so that he doesn't go to hell; he doesn't actually give any thought to the action or prayer. That's part of the beauty of the ending--he takes his life into his own hands and rejects the pleas of his mother to resume his faith.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with your point. I feel like in doing this, Joyce is sort of criticizing the Catholic church itself. I think that this is Joyce's way of saying that the way that Catholicism teaches christianity ultimately pushes its followers away from truly being faithful.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You make a good point. Stephen does follows religious doctrine out of fear throughout the whole book. Stephen's rejection of his faith at the end of the novel might even be seen as a climactic rejection of his fear.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Stephen basically says that in his eyes God is just the holder of the holy pandie bat, waiting to smite him down for his sin. That isn't a healthy relationship for anyone, to live in constant fear of the other, let alone God. To me I understand completely why Stephen is so ready to denounce his faith, probably because it wasn't his faith but rather that of the priests or his mother who forced it onto him.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I would say that Stephen's fear-based religious faith does help render his position at the end of the novel--poised to "exile" himself to Europe as an artist, rejecting his religion and nation and family--somewhat more "heroic," at least potentially. When Cranly challenges him as to why he would refuse to take Communion if he doesn't even believe in God, he claims to "neither believe nor disbelieve." It's so Stephen, but he wants to *withhold* his Communion from God--it's still "between him and God." So he claims that he's willing to be making an "eternal" mistake by pursuing this "wayward spirit" of art. He says that he's fully willing to go to hell for this choice--still in Satanic hero mode, to some extent!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

wHy dOnT yOu JuST cUT hIm??/

"wHy dOnT yOu JuST cUT hIm?" A simple solution proposed by 'Norman Bates' to Jason in response to his bully troubles. Ah, of course! Why wouldn't Jason think of that; just commit a felony and permanently handicap his tormentor. It's easy as that. In all seriousness though, I was definitely shocked and kind of amused by the extremity of the bus driver's solution, and I'm glad that Jason decided against it. A vital part of Jason's growth throughout the novel is him gradually learning to deal with his tormentors by accepting himself and learning to not care about the opinions of those he doesn't care about--as Holly Deblin says, "Don't let dickheads define who you are." This is also the Dean Morin approach: just ignore the dickheads and live how you want to live. I think Jason makes the better decision for himself here by choosing the arguably more difficult process of self-acceptance and growth as a person rather than taking the

The H in Holden stands for hypocrite

Phony, phony, phony, phony, phony. It seems like that's Holden favorite word since he uses it every other sentence. Holden manages to find a way to classify everyone he knows as a phony. People are phonies because they exchange greetings, people are phony because they like certain actors, or people are phonies because they have a worn out razor. The only people who are exempted from his obsession of phoniness are children, people he view as completely innocent and straightforward. Holden's definition of a phony person is generally someone who is superficial and has ulterior motives or agendas behind their actions. Holden sees this quality in Stradlater, who is very concerned about his physical appearance yet is a complete slob around Holden. Stradlater also sucks up to him just so Holden would do his English homework for him. These traits exemplify the phoniness that Holden detests so much. It's interesting however, after seeing how much criticism Holden makes about pho

Tough Love?

The strained relationship between Benji and his father is not a blatantly obvious focus in the chapter "To Prevent Flare-Ups," but it is repeatedly hinted at by seemingly normal interactions which still put us readers off a bit. The sound of the liquor cabinet magnet is one example; it's a normal sound but through Benji's uneasy reaction to it we can pick up hints about his dad's alcoholism. An interesting argument brought up about their relationship is whether it is an abusive father-son relation or rather just tough love.  In particular I'm thinking of the scene in which Benji's father tells him to hit the kid that was making racial comments, and upon learning that Benji hadn't done so, he hit Benji instead. I guess this action could be interpreted as Benji's father teaching Benji that no one is on his side in the world so he must take action to defend himself against racism; it's just his father being tough on him because he cares and wan